AAAR 37th Annual Conference October 14 - October 18, 2019 Oregon Convention Center Portland, Oregon, USA
Abstract View
Application and Use of Low-cost Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring
YI LI, Houxin Cui, Mengxian Wu, Zhanbang Feng, SailBri Cooper Inc
Abstract Number: 725 Working Group: Air Quality Sensors: Low-cost != Low Complexity
Abstract Low-cost air quality sensors have attracted increasing attention in recent years due to their advantages over conventional methods, such as low power requirements, easy installation, and deployability in large numbers to cover large spatial areas. However, they also face many technical challenges regarding data quality, including signal drift, temperature/humidity effect, cross-interference, etc. To mitigate such issues and build a robust sensor-based system, a four-stage calibration quality control system is implemented, including standard material calibration, simulated environmental calibration, combined supervision calibration, and transfer calibration.
During standard material calibration, each individual sensor is screened for quality assurance by testing its response to known concentrations of standard gases of criteria air pollutants (SO2, NO2, CO, and O3). Then, the selected sensors are assembled into “sensor node” to measure the multiple pollutants simultaneously. These sensor nodes are then put in a control chamber to perform simulated environmental calibration. Standard gases and particulate matters are injected into the chamber simultaneously to simulate a wide range of ambient conditions by controlling temperature and humidity. Machine learning and neural-networking algorithms are applied to characterize sensor response. Next, the sensor nodes are installed outdoor with a Federal Reference Method (FEM) monitor in close vicinity to conduct in-field combined supervision calibration. Since the real ambient atmosphere is more complicated than the controlled chamber conditions, the FEM data is used to train the algorithms for improved sensor response. In regions without FEM nearby, the transfer calibration is implemented using mobile or portable equipment to optimize the calibration parameters.
The result shows that (1) after standard material and simulated environmental calibration, the correlation between sensors and FEM measurements increased from 0.4-0.6 to over 0.95; (2) after adaptive learning through in-field combined supervision and/or transfer calibration, the correlation between sensor and FEM improved from 0.6-0.75 to over 0.85. Over 10,000 sensor nodes (over 60,000 single sensors) calibrated through this four-stage calibration system have been successfully deployed in more than 80 cities across China and are currently being used in air quality monitoring for environmental management, research, and consulting. Recently, two sensors also show a steady performance during the wildfire season in the U.S.