The Use of Black Carbon Sensors to Enhance Particulate Matter Monitoring in Communities

Rebecca A. Sugrue, CHELSEA V. PREBLE, James D.A. Butler, Alaia Redon-Gabel, Pietro Marconi, Karan Shetty, Lee Ann Hill, Audrey Smith, Boris Lukanov, Thomas W. Kirchstetter, UC Berkeley

     Abstract Number: 530
     Working Group: Urban Aerosols

Abstract
Low-cost air pollution sensors are increasingly deployed to understand community exposures and determine local emission sources. Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is commonly measured, due in part to the affordability of commercial sensors. However, a significant portion of ambient PM2.5 may be attributable to pollution sources beyond the community boundaries. This study measured concentrations of PM2.5 and black carbon (BC), a component of PM2.5 emitted primarily from diesel engines and biomass burning, using low-cost monitors that employed laser scattering and filter-based absorption photometry methods, respectively. Over four weeks in two seasons, a monitoring network with 50 locations in Richmond, California, was established to evaluate the information gained from measuring both pollutants. Concentrations of BC varied more than PM2.5 both temporally and spatially. Monthly network-average BC was 3× higher in winter than late spring, while PM2.5 was instead 10% lower. In both seasons, average PM2.5 concentrations at two-thirds of sites were within ±10% of the network average, whereas only one-third of sites were within ±10% of the network-average BC concentration. The most and least polluted locations were more persistent across seasons for BC than PM2.5, and there was little commonality in the sites that experienced the highest concentrations of BC and PM2.5. While the five most polluted sites in the winter had an average BC concentration 2.2× the average concentration of the five least polluted sites, the temporal dynamics of the BC pollution at each of the sites were similar. Together, these spatiotemporal trends show that BC, a primary aerosol, is a better indicator for local pollution sources than PM2.5.